blackmagickvoodoopussy:

sparkamovement:

Olympics struggle with ‘policing femininity’: 

There are female athletes who will be competing at the Olympic Games this summer after undergoing treatment to make them less masculine.
Still others are being secretly investigated for displaying overly manly characteristics, as sport’s highest medical officials attempt to quantify — and regulate — the hormonal difference between male and female athletes.
Caster Semenya, the South African runner who was so fast and muscular that many suspected she was a man, exploded onto the front pages three years ago. She was considered an outlier, a one-time anomaly.
But similar cases are emerging all over the world, and Semenya, who was banned from competition for 11 months while authorities investigated her sex, is back, vying for gold.
Semenya and other women like her face a complex question: Does a female athlete whose body naturally produces unusually high levels of male hormones, allowing them to put on more muscle mass and recover faster, have an “unfair” advantage?
In a move critics call “policing femininity,” recent rule changes by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), the governing body of track and field, state that for a woman to compete, her testosterone must not exceed the male threshold.
If it does, she must have surgery or receive hormone therapy prescribed by an expert IAAF medical panel and submit to regular monitoring. So far, at least a handful of athletes — the figure is confidential — have been prescribed treatment, but their numbers could increase. Last month, the International Olympic Committee began the approval process to adopt similar rules for the Games.

There’s a lot going on here, but here’s what jumped out at us immediately: Women, particularly women athletes, are constantly told they’re not as strong or fast as men—and now that they’re proving otherwise, they’re being forced to undergo hormone treatments. We don’t think it’s a coincidence that women of color are coming under fire for this more than white women. From the article: “Lindsay Perry, another scientist, says sometimes whole teams of African women are dead ringers for men.” This is a clear example of how we’ve constructed a very particular, very narrow ideal of femininity and womanhood that devalues and casts aside black women in particular. 

Wow

I’m going to add my two-cents here… I don’t think that this is a race issue; it’s a feminism issue. Being of mixed decent (but not obviously so), I’m more inclined to look at both sides than those of “pure” (ha. That’s laughable) background. It’s not an attack on AAs, but it is an attack on women. The policing of female athletes is necessary, yes, but to require those who naturally produce more testosterone to change is just wrong. The testing can be embarrassing for athletes, and my heart went out to Castor during that time. The governing body should really try to keep those investigations under wraps better than they do.

blackmagickvoodoopussy:

sparkamovement:

Olympics struggle with ‘policing femininity’: 

There are female athletes who will be competing at the Olympic Games this summer after undergoing treatment to make them less masculine.

Still others are being secretly investigated for displaying overly manly characteristics, as sport’s highest medical officials attempt to quantify — and regulate — the hormonal difference between male and female athletes.

Caster Semenya, the South African runner who was so fast and muscular that many suspected she was a man, exploded onto the front pages three years ago. She was considered an outlier, a one-time anomaly.

But similar cases are emerging all over the world, and Semenya, who was banned from competition for 11 months while authorities investigated her sex, is back, vying for gold.

Semenya and other women like her face a complex question: Does a female athlete whose body naturally produces unusually high levels of male hormones, allowing them to put on more muscle mass and recover faster, have an “unfair” advantage?

In a move critics call “policing femininity,” recent rule changes by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), the governing body of track and field, state that for a woman to compete, her testosterone must not exceed the male threshold.

If it does, she must have surgery or receive hormone therapy prescribed by an expert IAAF medical panel and submit to regular monitoring. So far, at least a handful of athletes — the figure is confidential — have been prescribed treatment, but their numbers could increase. Last month, the International Olympic Committee began the approval process to adopt similar rules for the Games.

There’s a lot going on here, but here’s what jumped out at us immediately: Women, particularly women athletes, are constantly told they’re not as strong or fast as men—and now that they’re proving otherwise, they’re being forced to undergo hormone treatments. We don’t think it’s a coincidence that women of color are coming under fire for this more than white women. From the article: “Lindsay Perry, another scientist, says sometimes whole teams of African women are dead ringers for men.” This is a clear example of how we’ve constructed a very particular, very narrow ideal of femininity and womanhood that devalues and casts aside black women in particular. 

Wow

I’m going to add my two-cents here… I don’t think that this is a race issue; it’s a feminism issue. Being of mixed decent (but not obviously so), I’m more inclined to look at both sides than those of “pure” (ha. That’s laughable) background. It’s not an attack on AAs, but it is an attack on women. The policing of female athletes is necessary, yes, but to require those who naturally produce more testosterone to change is just wrong. The testing can be embarrassing for athletes, and my heart went out to Castor during that time. The governing body should really try to keep those investigations under wraps better than they do.

(via mochafleur)

  1. kisari reblogged this from stfufauxminists
  2. hip-mama reblogged this from albinwonderland
  3. warpathpimpin reblogged this from mochafleur
  4. lmb93 reblogged this from deanwhiskeychester
  5. amymurlowski reblogged this from therotund
  6. cheshworld reblogged this from femblr
  7. leparoxysmic reblogged this from meanwhilegradstudents
  8. 191t reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  9. ironmaryreblog reblogged this from femblr and added:
    Even the “solution” for this is terrible. Women who cross the male threshold receive medical intervention, why not let...
  10. gettingtothechurchontime reblogged this from wanderinghymns8
  11. wwwthebombdotcom reblogged this from sparkamovement
  12. aquilathegreat reblogged this from sparkamovement
  13. hopelesslypretty reblogged this from bravenewgirls
  14. the-lady-blue reblogged this from cannotkeepfromsinging
  15. totsa reblogged this from hedgehogballoon
  16. hpgal3 reblogged this from takealookatyourlife
  17. little-lovely-lily reblogged this from sparkamovement
  18. pyschomutt reblogged this from albinwonderland
  19. firinginthehole reblogged this from stupid-egg
  20. sunshinemonsters reblogged this from notyourheart
  21. necro-sheep reblogged this from thegang
  22. castielappreciationlife reblogged this from southernfeminist
  23. your-ridiculous-lies reblogged this from phanapoeia
  24. weareofthesun reblogged this from gtfothinspo
  25. phanapoeia reblogged this from sapphicmix
  26. limit-breaker reblogged this from sparkamovement
  27. hummelandersonchang reblogged this from feministdisney
  28. can-i-poke-it-with-a-stick reblogged this from thorsies
  29. little-fox-prince-kozak reblogged this from notalickofsense
  30. aetheria reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  31. bossestbitch reblogged this from vanana-bro